Table of Content



  1. 1 L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Policies, Regulations, and Standards


  2. 1.1 Autonomous Driving Classification and Standardization

  3. SAE Autonomous Driving Classification Standards (1)

  4. SAE Autonomous Driving Classification Standards (2)

  5. China’s "Automotive Driving Automation Classification" (GB/T 40429-2021) Implemented

  6. China’s "Automotive Driving Automation Classification": L3/L4 Definitions

  7. China’s "Automotive Driving Automation Classification": Chinese Standards Strengthen L3 Safety Requirements

  8. ISO TC22 ADAG Working Group

  9. ISO TC22/SC32/WG8 Working Group

  10. ISO WP29 United Nations World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations

  11. ISO’s First L4 Autonomous Driving System International Safety Standard: ISO 22737

  12. ISO 22737: L4 LSAD (Low-Speed Autonomous Driving) System Architecture


  13. 1.2 China’s Autonomous Driving Policies and Regulations

  14. China’s L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: Summary

  15. China’s L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: "Notice from Four Ministries on Conducting Pilot Programs for Intelligent Connected Vehicle Access and Road Travel"

  16. China’s L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: Ministry of Transport Issues "Autonomous Vehicle Transport Safety Service Guidelines (Trial)"


  17. 1.3 Global Autonomous Driving Policies and Regulations

  18. Global Autonomous Driving Industry Sees Substantial Policy Promotion

  19. Global L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: Summary

  20. Global L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: Japan’s "Road Traffic Law" Allows L4 Autonomous Vehicles and Robots on Roads

  21. Global L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: Japan’s Autonomous Driving Environment Construction Measures

  22. Global L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: Japan’s Autonomous Driving Development Goals

  23. Global L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Regulations: Japan’s RoAD to the L4 Project

  24. U. S. Plans to Ban Chinese Software in Autonomous Vehicles


  25. 2 L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Application Scenarios


  26. 2.1 L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Business Model Analysis

  27. Commercial Value of L3/L4 High-Level Autonomous Driving

  28. Social Value of L3/L4 High-Level Autonomous Driving

  29. Seven Major Application Scenarios for L3/L4 High-Level Autonomous Vehicles

  30. L4 Autonomous Driving Commercialization in Limited Scenarios and Related Companies

  31. Application Timeline and Market Size of L4 Autonomous Driving Major Scenarios Commercial Scale

  32. L2-L5 Autonomous Driving Penetration Rate in China and Global Markets, 2025-2035E

  33. China Robotaxi Market Size,2025-2035E

  34. L4 Commercialization Landing Model 1: L4 Multi-Scenario Layout

  35. L4 Commercialization Landing Model 2: L4 and L2++ Dual-Track Development

  36. L4 Commercialization Landing Model 3: Technology Downgrading from L4 to L2++, Startups Accelerating L2++ Mass Production Landing


  37. 2.2 L4 Application Scenario - Robotaxi

  38. Robotaxi Trend 1

  39. Robotaxi Trend 2

  40. Robotaxi Trend 3

  41. Three Types of Players in the Robotaxi Industry

  42. Robotaxi 2024: Summary of Global Automakers’ "Unmanned Driving" Layout Progress

  43. Three Operational Models Adopted by Global Automakers in Robotaxi Layout

  44. Global Major Automakers’ Robotaxi Layout in 2024: Layout Methods, Operational Models, Development Stages, and Vehicle Configurations Comparison (1)

  45. Global Major Automakers’ Robotaxi Layout in 2024: Layout Methods, Operational Models, Development Stages, and Vehicle Configurations Comparison (2)

  46. Foreign Leading Robotaxi Operators’ Layout in 2024: Layout Methods, Operational Models, Development Stages, and Vehicle Configurations Comparison

  47. Domestic Leading Robotaxi Operators’ Layout in 2024: Layout Methods, Operational Models, Development Stages, and Vehicle Configurations Comparison

  48. Current Development Stage Analysis of China’s Robotaxi Market

  49. Licenses and Qualifications Required for China’s Robotaxi Market to Transition from Technical Routine Testing to Commercial Model Verification

  50. Domestic Policy Pilot Zones Land In-Vehicle Unmanned Commercial Pilot Policies

  51. Main "Iron Triangle" Model Adopted by China’s Robotaxi Market Players

  52. Summary of "Iron Triangle" Model Players in the Robotaxi Market (1)

  53. Summary of "Iron Triangle" Model Players in the Robotaxi Market (2)

  54. China Robotaxi Ownership, 2024-2027E

  55. Single Vehicle Profit Model: Achieving Single Vehicle Profit Breakeven by 2027

  56. Expert Opinions on Robotaxi Scaled Landing


  57. 2.3 L3/L4 Personal Passenger Car Market

  58. The First Year of L3 Autonomous Driving Commercialization Begins, with Three Local Governments Introducing Supportive Policies to Boost Industry Development

  59. Multiple Automakers Preparing for L3 Autonomous Driving, Targeting 2025-2027 as the Key Phase for Mass Production

  60. Domestic Automakers with L3 Autonomous Driving Road Test Licenses

  61. End-to-End Large Model Mass Production Landing: L3-L4 Autonomous Driving Will Accelerate

  62. Starting from 2024, Multiple Automakers Accelerate AI Layput, Officially Entering a New Era of AI Deep Empowerment in Automotive Industry

  63. Comparison of L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Product Planning of New Car Makers

  64. Comparison of L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Product Planning of Domestic Leading Automakers

  65. Comparison of L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Product Planning of German and Japanese Leading Automakers


  66. 2.4 L4 Application Scenario - Unmanned Shuttles

  67. The Commercial Value of Unmanned Shuttles and Five Typical Application Scenarios

  68. 2024 Sees 20 Vehicle-Road-Cloud Integration Pilot Cities, Accelerating Unmanned Shuttle Demonstration Applications

  69. Targeted Policy Regulations Release Further Accelerate Unmanned Shuttle Landing

  70. Key Players in Domestic Low-Speed Unmanned Shuttle Scenarios 1: L4 Autonomous Driving System Providers (1)

  71. Key Players in Domestic Low-Speed Unmanned Shuttle Scenarios 1: L4 Autonomous Driving System Providers (2)

  72. Key Players in Domestic Low-Speed Unmanned Shuttle Scenarios 2: OEMs

  73. Unmanned Shuttle Products: WeRide Autonomous Minibus

  74. Unmanned Shuttle Products: PIX Robobus 2.0

  75. Unmanned Shuttle Products: Qcraft Dragon Boat Series

  76. Commercial Operation of RoboBus: WeRide officially Launched Commercial Charging Operation in Guangzhou

  77. Unmanned Shuttle Market Size Forecast

  78. Layout of Some Unmanned Shuttle Players


  79. 2.5 L4 Application Scenario - Unmanned Delivery

  80. Last Mile Transformation: Rise of Unmanned Delivery

  81. National Policies Encourage the Development of Unmanned Delivery Vehicles to Effectively Reduce Social Logistics Costs

  82. Development Trend 1: Local Administrative Rules Are Released Intensively, Opening the "Access" Door for On-road Use of Unmanned Delivery

  83. Trend 2: Innovation Cities Show Significant Leader Agglomeration Effects, and Multiple Industries Actively Expand into Lower-Tier Markets

  84. Experts? Opinions on the Development of the L4 Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Market

  85. Chinese Outdoor Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Market Size Forecast

  86. Status Quo and Industry Chain of Unmanned Delivery

  87. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (1): Meituan

  88. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (2): Cainiao

  89. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (3): Haomo.ai

  90. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (4): Neolix

  91. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (5): Rino.ai

  92. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (6): Profile of ZELOS

  93. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (6): Product Matrix and Parameters of ZELOS

  94. Major Players Deploying Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Products (7): Go Further.AI

  95. Key Player 1: Comparison of Commercial Operation Progress between Suppliers of L4 Autonomous Driving Systems for Unmanned Delivery

  96. Key Player 2: Comparison of Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Commercial Operation Progress between Internet Scenario Players

  97. Key Player 3: Comparison of Unmanned Delivery Vehicle Commercial Operation Progress between Logistics and Courier Scenario Players

  98. Unmanned Delivery Business Models

  99. Focus of Unmanned Delivery Commercialization (1)

  100. Focus of Unmanned Delivery Commercialization (2)


  101. 2.6 L4 Application Scenario - Autonomous Trucks

  102. Autonomous Trucks Face Development Bottlenecks

  103. Competitive Landscape of L3+/L4 Autonomous Truck System Suppliers

  104. Technology Routes for Autonomous Truck Development

  105. Autonomous Truck Business Models: Mine Scenario

  106. Autonomous Truck Business Models: Port Scenario

  107. Commercial Application Solutions for Autonomous Trucks

  108. Key Players in the Foreign Autonomous Truck Market

  109. Player 1 in Chinese Autonomous Truck Market: Autonomous Truck Solution Providers (1)

  110. Player 1 in Chinese Autonomous Truck Market: Autonomous Truck Solution Providers (2)

  111. Player 2 in Chinese Autonomous Truck Market: Traditional Heavy Truck Companies

  112. Player 3 in Chinese Autonomous Truck Market: Emerging Truck Manufacturers

  113. Comparison between Major L4 Autonomous Truck Suppliers

  114. RoboTruck Solutions

  115. RoboTruck Closed Scenario Application Cases

  116. Status Quo of China’s Autonomous Truck Market Segments - Port

  117. Status Quo of China’s Autonomous Truck Market Segments - Mine

  118. Status Quo of China’s Autonomous Truck Market Segments - Park Logistics

  119. China’s Autonomous Truck Market Size Forecast


  120. 3 Key Technologies for Mass Production of L4 Autonomous Driving


  121. 3.1 Key Technologies for L4 Autonomous Driving: Algorithms

  122. L4 Autonomous Driving Requires Higher Computing Power (1)

  123. L4 Autonomous Driving Requires Higher Computing Power (2)

  124. Evolution of Autonomous Driving Algorithms

  125. Autonomous Driving Algorithms: Modular Algorithms

  126. Autonomous Driving Algorithms: End-to-End Foundation Model Algorithms

  127. Evolution of Foundation Model Algorithms for Autonomous Driving

  128. Application of Foundation Models Accelerates the Implementation of L3/L4 Autonomous Driving

  129. Comparison of End-to-End System Solution Layout between ADAS Tier1s (1)

  130. Comparison of End-to-End System Solution Layout between ADAS Tier1s (2)

  131. Comparison of End-to-End System Solution Layout between Other Autonomous Driving Companies

  132. Comparison of End-to-End System Solution Layout between OEMs (1)

  133. Comparison of End-to-End System Solution Layout between OEMs (2)


  134. 3.2 Key Technologies for L4 Autonomous Driving: Data Loop

  135. High-Level Autonomous Driving Evolves Towards Data-Centric Approach

  136. Importance of Data Loop for L4 Autonomous Driving

  137. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Technology 1: Data-Driven Models for Autonomous Driving

  138. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Technology 2: Cloud Computing Infrastructure and Big Data Processing Technologies

  139. Suppliers with Autonomous Driving Data Loop Capabilities

  140. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Suppliers (1)

  141. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Suppliers (2)

  142. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Suppliers (3)

  143. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Case 1: Tesla (1)

  144. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Case 1: Tesla (2)

  145. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Case 2: Momenta

  146. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Case 3

  147. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Case 4

  148. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Case 5

  149. Autonomous Driving Data Loop Case 6


  150. 3.3 Key Technologies for L4 Autonomous Driving: Redundancy

  151. Autonomous Driving Redundant System Suppliers: Braking Redundancy

  152. Autonomous Driving Redundant System Suppliers: Sensor Redundancy

  153. Autonomous Driving Redundant System Suppliers: Computing Redundancy

  154. Autonomous Driving Redundant System Cases (1): BMW L4/L5 Autonomous Driving Redundant System

  155. Autonomous Driving Redundant System Cases (2): Baidu Sensor Redundancy


  156. 3.4 Key Technologies for L4 Autonomous Driving: Vehicle-Road-Cloud Cooperation

  157. Vehicle-Road Cooperation Enables Smart Autonomous Mobility

  158. Release of the Cooperative Architecture Design of Collaborative Automated Driving System (1)

  159. Release of the Cooperative Architecture Design of Collaborative Automated Driving System (2)

  160. China Established Its First Vehicle-Road-Cloud Integrated Research Center

  161. AI Foundation Models Enable Vehicle-Road-Cloud Integration, Accelerating Autonomous Driving Implementation

  162. China’s First L4 Autonomous Driving Highway with Vehicle-Road-Cloud Cooperation Was Officially Opened

  163. Vehicle-Road-Cloud Cooperation Solution Suppliers (1)

  164. Vehicle-Road-Cloud Cooperation Solution Suppliers (2)

  165. Vehicle-Road-Cloud Cooperation Solution Suppliers (3)

  166. Vehicle-Road-Cloud Integrated Solution: MOGO Package 2.0 by Mogo.ai

  167. L4 Autonomous Driving Case Based on Vehicle-Road-Cloud Cooperation: Yangshan Port Autonomous Driving


  168. 3.5 Key Technologies for L4 Autonomous Driving: HD Maps and Positioning

  169. Requirements of L4 Autonomous Driving for HD Maps (1)

  170. Requirements of L4 Autonomous Driving for HD Maps (2)

  171. Requirements of L4 Autonomous Driving for High-precision Positioning Technology

  172. L3/L4 Autonomous Driving HD Map Providers: Traditional Map Providers (1)

  173. L3/L4 Autonomous Driving HD Map Providers: Traditional Map Providers (2)

  174. L3/L4 Autonomous Driving HD Map Providers: Commercial Vehicles (1)

  175. L3/L4 Autonomous Driving HD Map Providers: Commercial Vehicles (2)

  176. L3/L4 Autonomous Driving HD Maps and Positioning Cases


  177. 4 L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Solutions of OEMs


  178. 4.1 XPeng

  179. AI-Defined Automotive Transformation Layout

  180. Autonomous Driving Plan: Parallel Development of L2 and L4

  181. Autonomous Driving System Evolution Path

  182. L4 Autonomous Driving Plan: XPeng ROBOTAXI (1)

  183. L4 Autonomous Driving Plan: XPeng ROBOTAXI (2)

  184. The Ultimate Form Before XPeng Achieves L4 Autonomous Driving: XPeng Navigation Guided Pilot (XNGP) (1)

  185. The Ultimate Form Before XPeng Achieves L4 Autonomous Driving: XPeng Navigation Guided Pilot (XNGP) (2)

  186. All-Scenario Intelligent Driving Architecture – XBrain

  187. Intelligent Driving Technology Bases (1): Perception Architecture – XNet 1.0

  188. Intelligent Driving Technology Bases (1): Perception Architecture – XNet 2.0

  189. Intelligent Driving Technology Bases (2): Planning and Control Architecture – XPlanner

  190. End-to-end System (1): Architecture

  191. End-to-end System (2): Intelligent Driving Model

  192. End-to-end System (2): Intelligent Driving Model

  193. End-to-end System (3): AI+XNGP

  194. End-to-end System (4): Organizational Change

  195. Key to the Next Generation of Mid- and back-end Capabilities: Data Processing Efficiency

  196. AI Technology Bases for the Second Half of Intelligent Driving (1): Data Collection

  197. AI Technology Bases for the Second Half of Intelligent Driving (2): Data Labeling - Fully Automatic Labeling System

  198. AI Technology Bases for the Second Half of Intelligent Driving (3): Data Training - Autonomous Driving Computing Platform "Fuyao"

  199. AI Technology Bases for the Second Half of Intelligent Driving (4): Data Deployment


  200. 4.2 Li Auto

  201. Autonomous Driving System Evolution Path

  202. Accelerate L3/L4 Deployment and Further Extend Towards AGI in the Future

  203. Algorithm Architecture of Intelligent Driving 3.0 – End-to-End Algorithm Architecture Based on Foundation Models

  204. Hardware Foundation & Algorithm Models in the Era of Intelligent Driving 3.0

  205. End-to-End Solutions (1): Iterative Evolution of System 1

  206. End-to-End Solutions (2): System 1 (End-to-End Model) + System 2 (VLM)

  207. End-to-End Solutions (3): Next-Generation Autonomous Driving Technology Architecture

  208. Underlying Technologies of Intelligent Driving End-to-End Algorithm: BEV Model + NPN Feature Extraction + TIN Model (1)

  209. Underlying Technologies of Intelligent Driving End-to-End Algorithm: BEV Model + NPN Feature Extraction + TIN Model (2)

  210. Perception Algorithm: BEV+Transformer+OCC

  211. Control and Planning Algorithm: Spatiotemporal Joint Planning + MPC model

  212. Autonomous Driving Training Platform: Poseidon Training Platform

  213. L4 Autonomous Driving Planning: Plan to Enter the Field of Intelligent Driving Logistics

  214. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology Base: Data-driven - Data Closed Loop (1)

  215. Autonomous Driving Technology Base: Data-driven - Data Closed Loop (2)

  216. Autonomous Driving Technology Base: Data-driven - Data Closed Loop (3)


  217. 4.3 Chery

  218. Profile of ZDRIVE.AI (1)

  219. ZDRIVE.AI Develops both ADAS and L4 High-level Autonomous Driving Products

  220. End-to-end System Development Plan

  221. L4 Autonomous Driving Plan (1)

  222. L4 Autonomous Driving Plan (2): Robotaxi 1.0

  223. L4 Autonomous Driving Plan (3): Robotaxi 2.0

  224. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology Base: Drive 2.0

  225. Humanoid Robot Layout


  226. 4.4 GAC

  227. L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Product Layout Plan and Implementation Timetable

  228. Robotaxi Layout: Independent Operation + External Cooperation

  229. Robotaxi Layout: Ecosystem Partners and Production Models

  230. Release of the First Large-scale Intelligent Driving Platform for Commercial Vehicles

  231. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology Analysis: GAC Aion Robotaxi

  232. GAC Aion and Wuxi Communications Industry Group: Establish L4 Autonomous Driving Demonstration Area


  233. 4.5 Great Wall Motor

  234. Great Wall Motor’s L3/L4 Autonomous Driving Planning Route

  235. Haomo.ai’s Hpilot Autonomous Driving Product Roadmap

  236. Haomo.ai’s Technology Bases in Era of Autonomous Driving 3.0 (1): MANA Data Intelligence System

  237. Haomo.ai’s Technology Bases in Era of Autonomous Driving 3.0 (2): Autonomous Driving Generative AI Model Drive GPT (1)

  238. Haomo.ai’s Technology Bases in Era of Autonomous Driving 3.0 (2): Autonomous Driving Generative AI Model Drive GPT (2)

  239. Haomo.ai’s Technology Bases in Era of Autonomous Driving 3.0 (3): Intelligent Computing Center MANA OASIS


  240. 4.6 Tesla

  241. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under U.S. Department of Transportation Proposes A National Framework AV-STEP

  242. Tesla Accelerates the Robotaxi Plan

  243. L4 Product Portfolio

  244. AD Algorithm Development History

  245. End-to-end Process Overview, 2023-2024

  246. AD Algorithm Development History: FSD V12

  247. “End-to-end” Algorithm

  248. Core Elements of the Perception and Decision Full-Stack Integrated Model

  249. Tesla Semi: Weakening Autonomous Driving Features (1)

  250. Tesla Semi: Weakening Autonomous Driving Features (2)

  251. Tesla Semi: Weakening Autonomous Driving Features (3)


  252. 4.7 Toyota

  253. Toyota ADAS/AD Development Path

  254. Toyota L3 Guardian

  255. Toyota L4 Autonomous Driving Solutions: bZ4X Robotaxi (1)

  256. Toyota L4 Autonomous Driving Solutions: bZ4X Robotaxi (2)

  257. Toyota L4 Autonomous Driving Solutions: Autonomous Driving System Redundancy Design

  258. Toyota L4/L5 System: e-Palette Platform

  259. Toyota End-to-end Autonomous Driving Layout

  260. Nissan ADAS/AD Development Path

  261. Nissan ADAS: Iteration Process

  262. Nissan Shared Mobility Development Process (1)

  263. Japanese Government Accelerated Industrial Implementation of L4 Autonomous Driving in 2024

  264. Nissan Shared Mobility Development Process (2)

  265. Nissan’s Robotaxi Progress in Japanese and Chinese Markets in 2024

  266. Nissan Robotaxi Business

  267. Nissan Launches Robotaxi Demonstration Operation in Suzhou

  268. Nissan China’s Layout in China: Conduct Robotaxi Tests in Suzhou


  269. 4.8 Volvo

  270. Autonomous Driving Technology Route

  271. Autonomous Driving - L3 Ride Pilot

  272. Global - L4 System: Highway Pilot

  273. L4 Autonomous Driving Solution

  274. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 1: Dual Computing Platforms + Execution Redundancy

  275. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 2: Data-driven Software


  276. 4.9 Mercedes-Benz

  277. Mercedes-Benz Is Committed to Developing and Upgrading L3 Autonomous Driving Technology

  278. L3 Autonomous Driving Solutions (1): Drive Pilot

  279. L3 Autonomous Driving Solutions (2): Redundant Design (1)

  280. L3 Autonomous Driving Solutions (2): Redundant Design (2)

  281. Mercedes-Benz Has Formed A Multi-line Intelligent Driving Path for L2, L3, and L4

  282. L4 Autonomous Driving Solution: Driverless Parking System


  283. 4.10 BMW

  284. On-road Use of L3 Autonomous Driving Accelerates

  285. L3 Autonomous Driving Solution: Personal Pilot


  286. 4.11 Volkswagen

  287. Volkswagen Adjusts Its Autonomous Driving Business to Accelerate the Implementation of L4 Commercial Vehicles

  288. Volkswagen’s L4 Autonomous Driving Solution: ID. Buzz AD (2)

  289. SAIC Volkswagen’s L4 Autonomous Driving Planning

  290. SAIC Volkswagen’s L4 Autonomous Driving Platform Sensor Solution


  291. 4.12 SAIC

  292. Policies Protect IM Motors to Accelerate L3/L4 Layout

  293. Profile of SAIC Intelligent Technology

  294. SAIC Intelligent Technology’s Robotaxi Commercialization Progress

  295. SAIC Intelligent Technology’s Robotaxi3.0

  296. SAIC AI LAB’s L4 Autonomous Driving Technologies (1): Advanced Autonomous Driving Technology Architecture 2.0

  297. SAIC AI LAB’s L4 Autonomous Driving Technologies (2): Fully Unmanned Technology Solution

  298. SAIC AI LAB’s L4 Autonomous Driving Technologies (3): Vehicle-cloud-road Integration

  299. SAIC’s L4 Autonomous Driving Layout


  300. 4.13 Geely

  301. Geely Accelerates L3/L4 Layout: Dual Wheel Drives of independent R&D and Strategic Ecosystem Cooperation

  302. Geely Released "Intelligent Vehicle Full-domain AI" Technology System

  303. L3 End-to-End Technology: End-to-End Plus Introduces Digital Precognition Network Based on Multimodal Large Language Models

  304. L3 End-to-End Technology: Analysis of End-to-End Plus System

  305. Geely’s ADAS Technology Layout: Geely Xingrui Intelligent Data Center

  306. Xingrui AI Foundation Model

  307. Geely’s L4 Application Solution: Vehicle Intelligence + 5G V2X


  308. 4.14 Changan

  309. ADAS Strategic Planning

  310. ADAS Strategy: Dubhe Strategy

  311. L4 Robotaxi Development History (1)

  312. L4 Robotaxi Development History (2)

  313. End-to-end System: BEV+LLM+GoT

  314. Production Model with End-to-end System: Changan NEVO E07


  315. 4.15 Other OEMs

  316. Hongqi’s L4 Autonomous Driving Technology Solution

  317. Yutong’s L4 Autonomous Driving Technology Solution


  318. 5 L4 Autonomous Driving Solutions of Tier1s and Startups


  319. 5.1 Waymo

  320. Profile

  321. Robotaxi Commercialization Progress

  322. L4 Product: Waymo One

  323. Comparison of Hardware Configurations Across Generations of Vehicle Models (First to Sixth Generation)

  324. L4 Strategic Partners and Cooperation Model

  325. Strategic OEM Partners (1)

  326. Strategic OEM Partners (2)

  327. Strategic Partners (3)

  328. L4 Autonomous Driving System: Waymo Driver

  329. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 1: Perception

  330. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 2: Architecture

  331. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 3: Data Model and Architecture

  332. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 4: Simulation

  333. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 4: Open Source Simulator

  334. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 5: Planning

  335. L4 Autonomous Driving Technology 6: Computing Platform

  336. Waymo Postponed Autonomous Truck Business Waymo Via

  337. Waymo Released End-to-end Multimodal Model for Autonomous Driving (EMMA)

  338. Limitations of EMMA


  339. 5.2 Aurora

  340. Aurora and Continental Cooperated to Build the Aurora Driver Autonomous Trucking System

  341. Autonomous Driving System: Aurora Driver Platform (1)

  342. Autonomous Driving System: Aurora Driver Platform (2)

  343. Autonomous Driving Technology: Perception and Decision

  344. L4 Autonomous Driving Layout


  345. 5.3 Baidu Apollo

  346. Profile of Baidu Apollo

  347. Core Robotaxi Service Operators’ Exploration of Business Models

  348. Robotaxi Development Plan

  349. Apollo’s Robotaxi Development Progress in 2024

  350. Sixth Generation Robotaxi Models

  351. The New-generation Robotaxi Introduces Two-Model End-to-end: Adopting A Strategy of First Segmentation and Then Joint Training

  352. Robotaxi Commercialization Progress

  353. Cost Reduction Logic of Six Generation Robotaxi Models and Analysis on Wuhan Autonomous Vehicle Commercial Demonstration Area

  354. Robotaxi Operation and Cost in the Shanghai Jiading Intelligent Connection Demonstration Operation Area

  355. L4 Technology 1: Safety Redundancy

  356. L4 Technology 2: Computing Platform

  357. L4 Product 1: Apollo Go (6)

  358. L4 Product 2: 5G Cloud Valeting

  359. L4 Product 3: Strategic Investment in Autonomous Trucks

  360. L4 Product 4: AVP


  361. 5.4 Pony.ai

  362. Profile

  363. Three Major Business Lines

  364. Robotaxi Business Model (1)

  365. Robotaxi Business Model (2)

  366. Robotaxi Business Model (3)

  367. Global Robotaxi Strategy

  368. Strategic Cooperation Ecosystem

  369. Operation

  370. Robotaxi Commercialization Progress

  371. Sixth Generation Robotaxi

  372. Sixth Generation L4 Autonomous Driving System

  373. Commitment to Integrated Hardware and Software Co-Development

  374. Hardware Architecture of L4 Autonomous Driving System (1)

  375. Hardware Architecture of L4 Autonomous Driving System (2)

  376. Computing Unit of L4 Autonomous Driving System (1)

  377. Computing Unit of L4 Autonomous Driving System (2)

  378. Data Closed-loop Capability of L4 Autonomous Driving System

  379. Autonomous Freight Enters the Inter-provincial Stage

  380. Obtain Inter-provincial Heavy Autonomous Truck License

  381. Recent Dynamics in Cooperation


  382. 5.5 WeRide

  383. Profile (