Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Surging Road Accidents, Sports-Related and Other Injuries
4.2.2 Rising Preference for Minimally Invasive Surgeries
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Availability of Alternative Treatments in line with the Shortage of Skilled Orthopaedic Surgeons
4.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Product Type
5.1.1 Manual Fixators
5.1.2 Computer-Aided Fixators
5.2 By Fixation Type
5.2.1 Unilateral and Bilateral
5.2.2 Circular
5.2.3 Hybrid
5.2.4 Others
5.3 By Application
5.3.1 Orthopedic Deformities
5.3.2 Fracture Fixation
5.3.3 Infected Fracture
5.3.4 Limb Correction
5.3.5 Others
5.4 By End-User
5.4.1 Hospitals
5.4.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
5.4.3 Orthopedic and Trauma Centers
5.5 Geography
5.5.1 North America
5.5.1.1 United States
5.5.1.2 Canada
5.5.1.3 Mexico
5.5.2 Europe
5.5.2.1 Germany
5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
5.5.2.3 France
5.5.2.4 Italy
5.5.2.5 Spain
5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
5.5.3.1 China
5.5.3.2 Japan
5.5.3.3 India
5.5.3.4 Australia
5.5.3.5 South Korea
5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.5.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.5.4.1 GCC
5.5.4.2 South Africa
5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.5.5 South America
5.5.5.1 Brazil
5.5.5.2 Argentina
5.5.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Johnson & Johnson (DePuy Synthes)
6.1.2 Orthofix Holdings, Inc.
6.1.3 Ortho-SUV Ltd.
6.1.4 Response Ortho LLC
6.1.5 Smith & Nephew
6.1.6 Stryker
6.1.7 Zimmer Biomet


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS