Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Growing Preference for Minimal Invasive Surgeries
4.2.2 Increased Product Availability
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Noise of The Device
4.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Product
5.1.1 Smoke Evacuating Systems
5.1.2 Smoke Evacuation Filters
5.1.3 Smoke Evacuation Pencil and Wands
5.1.4 Smoke-Evac Fusion Products
5.1.5 Smoke Evacuation Tubing
5.1.6 Accessories
5.2 By Application
5.2.1 Laproscopic Surgeries
5.2.2 Orthopedic Surgeries
5.2.3 Medical Aesthetic Surgeries
5.2.4 Others
5.3 By End User
5.3.1 Hospitlas
5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
5.3.3 Others
5.4 Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 Germany
5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
5.4.2.3 France
5.4.2.4 Italy
5.4.2.5 Spain
5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 India
5.4.3.4 Australia
5.4.3.5 South Korea
5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.4.4.1 GCC
5.4.4.2 South Africa
5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.4.5 South America
5.4.5.1 Brazil
5.4.5.2 Argentina
5.4.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Medtronic Plc.
6.1.2 Conmed Corporation
6.1.3 Ecolab Inc.
6.1.4 Stryker Corporation
6.1.5 Ethicon, Inc.
6.1.6 Pall Corporation
6.1.7 Olympus Corporation
6.1.8 Cooper Medical, Inc.
6.1.9 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
6.1.10 KLS Martin Group


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS