Table of Content


1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Increasing Number of Surgeries and Rising Healthcare Expenditure
4.2.2 Technological Advancements and Existing Advantages
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Risks associated with the Usage of Mesh
4.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Type
5.1.1 Absorbable
5.1.2 Non-Absrobable
5.2 By Application
5.2.1 Hernia Repair
5.2.2 Traumatic or Surgical Wound
5.2.3 Others
5.3 By End-User
5.3.1 Hospitals and Clinics
5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
5.3.3 Others
5.4 Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 Germany
5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
5.4.2.3 France
5.4.2.4 Italy
5.4.2.5 Spain
5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 India
5.4.3.4 Australia
5.4.3.5 South Korea
5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.4.4.1 GCC
5.4.4.2 South Africa
5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.4.5 South America
5.4.5.1 Brazil
5.4.5.2 Argentina
5.4.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Pierson Surgical Ltd
6.1.2 Becton, Dickinson and Company
6.1.3 Bio-Rad
6.1.4 Ethicon US, LLC. (Johnson & Johnson)
6.1.5 Medtronic
6.1.6 Molnlycke Healthcare
6.1.7 Tepha, Inc.


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS