Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Increasing Patient Pool for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
4.2.2 Rising Demand for Treatments with Minimal Invasions as well as Better Success Rates
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Complications Associated with Stent Tubes
4.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Product Type
5.1.1 Monocanalicular Lacrimal Duct Stent Tube
5.1.2 Bicanalicular Lacrimal Duct Stent Tube
5.2 By End-User
5.2.1 Hospitals
5.2.2 Ophthalmic Clinics
5.2.3 Others
5.3 Geography
5.3.1 North America
5.3.1.1 United States
5.3.1.2 Canada
5.3.1.3 Mexico
5.3.2 Europe
5.3.2.1 Germany
5.3.2.2 United Kingdom
5.3.2.3 France
5.3.2.4 Italy
5.3.2.5 Spain
5.3.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.3.3 Asia-Pacific
5.3.3.1 China
5.3.3.2 Japan
5.3.3.3 India
5.3.3.4 Australia
5.3.3.5 South Korea
5.3.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.3.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.3.4.1 GCC
5.3.4.2 South Africa
5.3.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.3.5 South America
5.3.5.1 Brazil
5.3.5.2 Argentina
5.3.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Aurolab
6.1.2 Bess Medizintechnik GmbH
6.1.3 FCI Ophthalmics
6.1.4 Gunther Weiss Scientific Glass
6.1.5 Kaneka Pharma America LLC
6.1.6 Becton, Dickinson and Company
6.1.7 Beaver-Visitec International, Inc


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS