Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Increasing Number of Surgeries
4.2.2 Growing Incidence of Retained Surgical Instrument Cases
4.2.3 Mandatory Regulation by FDA for Unique Device Identification
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Cost Associated with Implementation of Surgical Instrument Tracking System
4.3.2 Lack of Skilled Professionals and Technological Advancements
4.4 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Technology
5.1.1 Barcodes
5.1.2 RFID (Radio Frequency Identification)
5.2 By Component
5.2.1 Software
5.2.2 Hardware
5.2.3 Services
5.3 By End User
5.3.1 Hospitals
5.3.2 Other End Users
5.4 By Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 Germany
5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
5.4.2.3 France
5.4.2.4 Italy
5.4.2.5 Spain
5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 India
5.4.3.4 Australia
5.4.3.5 South Korea
5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.4.4.1 GCC
5.4.4.2 South Africa
5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.4.5 South America
5.4.5.1 Brazil
5.4.5.2 Argentina
5.4.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Becton, Dickinson and Company
6.1.2 BESCO
6.1.3 Censis Technologies Inc.
6.1.4 NuTrace
6.1.5 Key Surgical Inc.
6.1.6 Keir Surgical Ltd
6.1.7 ScanCARE Pty Ltd
6.1.8 Spa Track Medical Limited
6.1.9 Steris PLC
6.1.10 Syrma Technology


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS