Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Rising Incidence of Diabetes and Associated Wounds
4.2.2 Increase in Volume of Surgical Procedures
4.2.3 Growing Geriatric Population
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Treatment Cost
4.4 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Product
5.1.1 Gels
5.1.2 Ointments & Creams
5.1.3 Surgical Devices
5.1.4 Ultrasound Devices
5.1.5 Mechanical Debridement Pads
5.1.6 Other Wound Debridement Products
5.2 By Method
5.2.1 Surgical Method
5.2.2 Enzymatic Method
5.2.3 Mechanical Method
5.2.4 Autolytic Method
5.2.5 Others
5.3 By Wound Type
5.3.1 Chronic Ulcers
5.3.2 Surgical & Traumatic Wounds
5.3.3 Burns
5.4 Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 Germany
5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
5.4.2.3 France
5.4.2.4 Italy
5.4.2.5 Spain
5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 India
5.4.3.4 Australia
5.4.3.5 South Korea
5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.4.4.1 GCC
5.4.4.2 South Africa
5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.4.5 South America
5.4.5.1 Brazil
5.4.5.2 Argentina
5.4.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Arobella Medical
6.1.2 B. Braun Melsungen AG
6.1.3 DeRoyal Industries
6.1.4 Histologics, LLC
6.1.5 Lohmann & Rauscher
6.1.6 Medaxis LLC
6.1.7 Misonix, Inc.
6.1.8 Monarch Labs
6.1.9 PulseCare Medical
6.1.10 Smith & Nephew plc


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS