1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Rising Preference for Minimally Invasive Procedures
4.2.2 Technological Advancements and New Product Launch
4.2.3 Increasing Prevalence of Sinusitis
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Risks Associated with Sinus Surgeries
4.3.2 Lack of Skilled Specialists
4.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Product
5.1.1 Balloon Sinus Dilation Devices
5.1.2 Sinus Implants
5.1.3 Handheld Instruments
5.1.4 Endoscopes
5.1.5 Other Products
5.2 By Procedure
5.2.1 Standalone Sinus Dilation Procedures
5.2.2 Hybrid Sinus Dilation Procedures
5.3 By End-User
5.3.1 Hospital
5.3.2 Specialty Clinic
5.3.3 Other End-Users
5.4 Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 Germany
5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
5.4.2.3 France
5.4.2.4 Italy
5.4.2.5 Spain
5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 India
5.4.3.4 Australia
5.4.3.5 South Korea
5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.4.4.1 GCC
5.4.4.2 South Africa
5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.4.5 South America
5.4.5.1 Brazil
5.4.5.2 Argentina
5.4.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Acclarent, Inc.
6.1.2 Creganna
6.1.3 Intersect ENT, Inc.
6.1.4 Johnson & Johnson
6.1.5 Medtronic Plc
6.1.6 Meril Life Sciences Private Limited
6.1.7 Olympus Corporation
6.1.8 SinuSys Corporation
6.1.9 Smith & Nephew
6.1.10 Stryker Corporation


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS