Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions
1.2 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Drivers
4.1.1 Emerging Demand for CO2 Injection Technique for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
4.1.2 Strict Government Norms towards GHG Emissions
4.2 Restraints
4.2.1 Huge CCS Technologies Implementation Cost
4.2.2 Growth in Shale Investments
4.3 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
4.4 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Consumers
4.4.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products and Services
4.4.5 Degree of Competition


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 Technology
5.1.1 Pre-combustion Capture
5.1.2 Oxy-fuel Combustion Capture
5.1.3 Post-combustion Capture
5.2 End-user Industry
5.2.1 Oil and Gas
5.2.2 Coal and Biomass Power Plant
5.2.3 Iron and Steel
5.2.4 Chemical
5.2.5 Other End-user Industries
5.3 Geography
5.3.1 Asia-Pacific
5.3.1.1 China
5.3.1.2 India
5.3.1.3 Japan
5.3.1.4 Australia
5.3.1.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.3.2 North America
5.3.2.1 United States
5.3.2.2 Canada
5.3.2.3 Mexico
5.3.3 Europe
5.3.3.1 Germany
5.3.3.2 United Kingdom
5.3.3.3 France
5.3.3.4 Norway
5.3.3.5 Netherlands
5.3.3.6 Rest of Europe
5.3.4 Rest of the World


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Mergers & Acquisitions, Joint Ventures, Collaborations, and Agreements
6.2 Market Ranking
6.3 Strategies Adopted by Leading Players
6.4 Company Profiles
6.4.1 Aker Solutions
6.4.2 Air Liquide
6.4.3 Dakota Gasification Company
6.4.4 ExxonMobil
6.4.5 Fluor Corporation
6.4.6 General Electric
6.4.7 Halliburton
6.4.8 Honeywell International Inc.
6.4.9 Japan CCS Company
6.4.10 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
6.4.11 NRG Energy Inc.
6.4.12 Schlumberger Limited
6.4.13 Royal Dutch Shell PLC
6.4.14 Siemens AG
6.4.15 Linde
6.4.16 LanzaTech
6.4.17 Occidental Petroleum Corporation


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS
7.1 Augmenting Prominence for Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS)
7.2 Other Opportunities