Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Increasing Number of Accidents and Traumatic Events
4.2.2 Rising Diabetic Foot Ulcers
4.2.3 Technological Advancements in the NPWT Devices
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Cost of Device and Treatment
4.3.2 Complications Associated With NPWT Device
4.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Product
5.1.1 Re-Usable Device
5.1.2 Single-Use Device
5.2 By Wound Type
5.2.1 Diabetic Foot Ulcer
5.2.2 Pressure Ulcer
5.2.3 Venous Leg Ulcer
5.2.4 Burn Wounds
5.2.5 Others
5.3 By End-user
5.3.1 Hospital
5.3.2 Homecare
5.3.3 Others
5.4 Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 Germany
5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
5.4.2.3 France
5.4.2.4 Italy
5.4.2.5 Spain
5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 India
5.4.3.4 Australia
5.4.3.5 South Korea
5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.4.4.1 GCC
5.4.4.2 South Africa
5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.4.5 South America
5.4.5.1 Brazil
5.4.5.2 Argentina
5.4.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.2 Acelity L.P. Inc.
6.3 Talley Group Limited
6.4 Smith & Nephew plc
6.5 Devon Medical, Inc.
6.6 Molnlycke Health Care
6.7 Medela AG
6.8 DeRoyal Industries, Inc.
6.9 ConvaTec Inc.
6.10 Cardinal Health, Inc.
6.11 Paul Hartmann AG


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS