The ’Global Insurer Footprint: Chubb Ltd’ report provides an in-depth analysis of the global operations of Chubb Ltd.


Summary
The ’Global Insurer Footprint: Chubb Ltd’ report provides analysis of each product category for countries in which Chubb Ltd operates, and comparative analysis with its competitors.

It provides country-specific data for key performance indicators such as written premium, incurred loss, claims paid, commissions and expenses, combined ratio, total assets, total investment income and net earned premium.

The report brings together Timetric’s research, modeling and analysis expertise, giving insurers access to information on Chubb Ltd’s global operations, its financial performance, country dynamics and competitive advantage.


Scope
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Chubb Ltd by country of operation:

  • It provides historical values by country for Chubb Ltd for the latest five years.
  • It offers a detailed analysis of the key countries in which Chubb Ltd operates.
  • It compares Chubb Ltd with its competitors in each country of operation.
  • It outlines recent developments related to Chubb Ltd in all its countries of operation.





Reasons To Buy

  • Make strategic business decisions with reference to Chubb Ltd’s profile and global operations by country, including its financial performance, recent developments and market share.
  • Understand the demand-side dynamics, key market trends and growth opportunities in Chubb Ltd’s countries of operation.
  • Assess the competitive dynamics in Chubb Ltd’s countries of operation.
  • Gain insights into Chubb Ltd’s operations and its impact on the industry’s competitive environment.




Key Highlights

  • Country-specific analysis of Chubb’s operations, with key performance indicators
  • Comparison of the top 10 insurers in Chubb’s countries of operation, with premium trends
  • Chubb’s modes of operation by country, and its position in its countries of operation
  • Country-specific analysis of the company’s product portfolio in comparison to its competitors