Table of Content

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study


2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Growing Incidence Of Pressure Ulcers and Diabetic Foot
4.2.2 Increasing Number of Surgical Procedures
4.2.3 Increasing Research and Technological Advancements in Interactive Dressings
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Cost of Advanced Interactive Wound Dressings
4.3.2 Stringent Regulatory Policies
4.4 Porter’s Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry


5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Type
5.1.1 Semi-permeable Films Dressing
5.1.2 Semi-permeable Foams Dressing
5.1.3 Hydrogel
5.2 By Application
5.2.1 Acute Wounds
5.2.2 Chronic Wounds
5.3 By End-User
5.3.1 Hospitals and Clinics
5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
5.4 Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 Germany
5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
5.4.2.3 France
5.4.2.4 Italy
5.4.2.5 Spain
5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 India
5.4.3.4 Australia
5.4.3.5 South Korea
5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 Middle-East and Africa
5.4.4.1 GCC
5.4.4.2 South Africa
5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa
5.4.5 South America
5.4.5.1 Brazil
5.4.5.2 Argentina
5.4.5.3 Rest of South America


6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 3M
6.1.2 B. Braun Melsungen AG
6.1.3 Cardinal Health, Inc
6.1.4 Coloplast
6.1.5 Integra Lifesciences
6.1.6 Johnson & Johnson
6.1.7 MediWound
6.1.8 Seton Pharmaceuticals
6.1.9 Smith & Nephew


7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS